Ethereum White Paper – annotated version (2015)
fermatslibrary.com
fermatslibrary.com
Was this submission to HN intended to generate interest to crowdsource more annotations (à la RapGenius)?
Snark aside, this is a really cool site. They seem to be attempting to annotate a variety of papers (amateur and professional), so it's understandable. It is a bit jarring to see something by Kenneth Arrow or Feynman alongside Ethereum marketing material, though.
They've even got McCarthy (maybe a better expenditure of time):
http://fermatslibrary.com/s/recursive-functions-of-symbolic-...
Care to explain why?
Until/Unless I can acquire and manage proper securities & options via one a decentralised ledger, I reamain thoroughly unimpressed by anything other than the marketing efforts of most crypto projects.
Also, a "new currency" would be bitcoin. So far mr Butlerin's major achievement IMO is convincing major financial actors of the merits of his platform. As a private person, I'll take btc/ltc any day over etherium.
Don't know why people may try to create a separate standard for cryptocurrency.
The device itself is pretty impressive for $5 worth of parts, but I did not really hit "wow" until I saw how easy it was for this guy to take my money and establish a point of contact and a payment relationship that can support repeat business. (He's also the one who built this payment gateway, it lacks some for polish but it is also as a bonus, essentially proof of concept that shows how the device can work. tl;dr: it's a portable thin wallet that runs inside of the browser, you get a javascript file that you can save and keep as a backup of your keys. The arduino jobber is just doing the signatures.)
The tokens do not need to appreciate in value, that helps speculators of course, but if you don't yet recognize that Ethereum is a substantial advancement over Bitcoin, I can't really help you with that. You'll have to figure it out! While I'd love to get rich off of trading the coins, if they can simply just remain stable in valuation it is ultimately going to change how we do money around the world, I don't doubt this anymore.
> Don't know why people may try to create a separate standard for cryptocurrency.
Interpreting Ethereum to be "the separate standard for cryptocurrency" rather than the standard being about what is noteworthy. Eg. "Why aren't people just satisfied with Bitcoin, it is already the standard" Sorry! My mistake.
> Care to explain why?
(I believe that was sarcasm.)
The events surrounding TheDAO, which the annotations mention, occurred in 2016.
I'm not sure where the 2015 in the HN title is coming from.
It's also on genius, not super annotated
A lot of the buzz moved on to stuff like Music.ly but Genius is still doing good business.