I have mixed feelings about these types of comparisons.

On one hand, they provide some directional information. I wouldn't be surprised if a Go framework is generally faster than .NET.

On the other hand, they're usually set up in some suspect way: not quite apples to apples, the author knows one framework better than the other, or, most commonly, neglect other more important concerns. If I were considering Go vs .NET, I don't think serving 5 million requests in a burst would be very close to the top of my wishlist. Tooling, documentation, ecosystem, ease of hiring, open source projects, etc etc etc all seem far more important, but you don't see these in comparison articles all that often.