I don't know if you can do that with $20B but I feel these days that its more likely to occur rather than the opposite (which is to discover some underlying uncertainty principle that would prevent directing cellular action in a predefined way.)
I don't know if you can do that with $20B but I feel these days that its more likely to occur rather than the opposite (which is to discover some underlying uncertainty principle that would prevent directing cellular action in a predefined way.)
You can't.
The NIH budget is ~$30B/year and we don't know the basic mechanism of action for many of the drugs we currently rely on to treat disease. It turns out biochemistry is pretty complicated.
Mostly because cancer tends to be associated with dysfunction and it isn't necessarily the case that dysfunction can be externally corrected.
We know that every cancer is the result of a genetic change in the cell DNA which disables apoptosis (cell death).
We know that we have a system in our bodies that is tasked with destroying cells with damaged DNA. (our immune system)
We know that when the immune system attacks cancer cells, it reliably removes the cancer from our systems.
What we don't know is how to reliably program, and deprogram, our immune systems on demand. If we knew both exactly how the immune system programming system worked, and could build tools to enable us to use that knowledge to actually program or deprogram our immune cells ...
Then we would be able to cure all cancers and autoimmune disorders.