Dementia and brain research could be improved thanks to new sensor
www3.imperial.ac.uk
www3.imperial.ac.uk
Here we tested TaiNi, a novel ultra-lightweight (<2 g) low power wireless system allowing 72-hours of recording from 16 channels sampled at ~19.5 KHz (9.7 KHz bandwidth). We captured local field potentials and action-potentials while mice engaged in unrestricted behaviour in a variety of environments and while performing tasks.
I'm used to dealing with sampling rates above 40 kHz, so the temporal resolution has a way to go, but it looks like the recorder is fairly flexible about what kind of electrode arrays it can use, which is a real positive:
Mice were implanted with either a single shank 16 channel probe attached to a microdrive (Cambridge Neurotech, GB) targeting the CA1 region of the hippocampus (n = 14 mice; AP: +1.7 mm, ML: −0.3 mm relative to Bregma), or a static dual shank silicon probe (n = 2 mice; 8 sites per shank (Neuronexus, USA)) targeting the medial prefrontal cortex (AP: +1.7 mm, ML: −0.3 mm relative to Bregma & DV: −2.0 mm from brain surface) & dorsal hippocampus (AP: −1.9 mm, ML: −2.0 mm relative to Bregma & DV: −2.0 mm from brain surface).
+5 cool kid points for using Klusta-based spike sorting -- though because this group is at ICL that's not too surprising.
My layman take: 9 Khz bandwidth in principle means resolution of 9000 evenly spaced peaks of different magnitude. Perhaps those correlate to different distances between each neuron and the sensor, especially if 16 channels allow for spatial resolution, and if the differences might actually be too small to resolve naively, I wouldn't doubt if I were told statistical tricks existed to filter single signals.
Overall, major features are interesting enough, I guess.
Spike sorting was done with this project, which i have used and found to be quite good: https://github.com/cortex-lab/KiloSort
19 kHz sampling rate gives you a maximum temporal precision of ~50 ms, which is pretty good.
They claim a nicely low input referred noise (~4 uV), so 19 kHz should be great for spike detection, though as you note upthread it's a little low for spike sorting: it's nice to have at least 30 kHz.
I wonder how much weight savings they got over combining a wireless chip and a bare-die Intan [1].
I wonder if it's more of a form factor thing than a weight thing.
I wonder how it holds up in multi-animal cages, too.