Why English is such a great language for puns
economist.com
economist.com
(this makes learning Vietnamese a kind of trying experience, as every mispronunciation is a source of hilarity for native speakers :) )
Japanese comedians can't go 10 minutes without making a pun, and a lay person could strongly agree that it is the language that uses them the most due to all common similar-sounding words, frequent games with kanji and their different meanings etc. It's common for even business names to be puns in Japan.
You have a carrot, and put it in a pot. You have a tomato, and put it in a pot. You have a potato, and put it in a pot. What's in the pot?
三つ野菜だ。"Three vegetables." It sounds like "Mitsuya Cider," a brand of soda.
Tired salaryman comes from after a long day at work, strips off clothes. His wife has prepared a hot bath, so he enters, pulls out a tub of kimchi (Jp. kimuchi) and blissfully exhales aah, kimochi ii ("feels good").
Lots more here:
https://everything2.com/title/Japanese+puns+that+are+not+fun...
マイケル・ジャクソンの好きな色は何ですか? 青!
Michael Jackson no sukina iro wa nan desu ka? AO!
It means: What's Michael Jackson's favorite color? BLUE! (You are supposed to shout the "ao!" in a Jackson-like falsetto.)
Anime and manga are LOADED with puns. For example the Saiyans in Dragon Ball are called such because saiya is a reversal of yasai (野菜, "vegetable"). Which explains why they have names like Kakarott, Raditz, Vegeta, and so forth.
There was a Korean guy working in a Japanese company.
One day, his coworker went out to the roof for a quick cigarette break. Another person came in and asked where he was, so the Korean guy would reply (in Japanese), "Oh, Mr. Tanaka is taking a break, on top of the roof."
The person blushes, and leaves wordlessly. The Korean guy is confused, and then realizes he used the Korean word for the roof: "oksang".
(Japanese okusan = wife)
Not only does English have many more homophones, and nouns can be used as verbs and vice versa, but English also has a much higher “word density” (for lack of a better term). The vocabulary is larger, and words tend to be shorter. The combination of the two means that you can take any short word, and odds are many other words with completely different meanings are just one letter-change away. On top of that, pronunciation is very inexact, which means many vowels and consonants sound alike.
These things make English pretty bad for oral comprehension, but great for puns.
Because one doesn't know other languages :-)
I know a guy who generates them constantly, in Russian. I even started wondering why Russian is so great language for puns?
>> . It has a large vocabulary and a rich stock of homophones from which puns can be made
Ok. What about the other 6000 languages? Do they have more/less homophones. French sure has a ton of them.
>> It is constantly evolving, with new words being invented and old ones given fresh meanings
Yes, like any other language.
>> And it is mostly uninflected, allowing for verbs and nouns to switch places
Good. But other languages, like German, can keep the suspense until the end of the sentence (where the verb is located), ending the sentence in an unexpected twist. So is this a distinct advantage? Is it so unique?
>> it has no gendered nouns
You would think languages with lots of declinations allow for smart puns too, right?
It seems it has been written by an English speaker with little knowledge of any other language.
In addition, many cultural sayings are based off "puns." For example, 年年有餘 (nian nian you yu, year after year there will be a surplus) is a common saying during the Chinese New Year. However, many families eat fish (魚, yu, fish) during the Chinese New Year because it sounds like surplus. And so, 年年有餘 is sometimes rendered 年年有魚 (nian nian you yu, year after year there will be fish).
In fact when I was watching the CCTV New year broadcast in English 7 or so years back, the translation and subtitles basically just gave up for all of the crosstalk segments. They just put a banner underneath saying basically "this is crosstalk now, sorry we can't translate it because it's too hard".
[0]: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/baidu-10-mythical-creatures-gr...
Does the article assert that English is the only language that is great with puns or is noticeably better than other languages at puns? That's what your points are addressing. The title only implies that English is great for puns, saying nothing about whether or not others are too.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https:...
The article doesn't try to argue that richer declensions make puns impossible, just that it makes it harder. I would definitely agree with that.
Maybe there is also a slight hint of intellectualism or some would say elitism in the references to classical quotes and trivia that's generally only picked up in higher education.
I rather like it though. It's a shame that the headlines in Sweden - where I live - looks more and more as the worst kind of clickbate. Puns are not exactly unknown here - and the dad-joke pun is is even named after the second largest city...
One thing that keeps coming up is how economical English seems to be compared to at least the other languages I've encountered. By "economical" I mean in terms of syllables. This seems to be a particularly useful property when it comes rhyming and lyrics and the like.
A few examples from Spanish:
nosotros/nosotras = we
demasiado = too
bastante = quite
primavera = spring
verano = summer
invierno = winter
bebemos = (we) drink
Also, as seems to be common in western European languages (other than English) is that more articles are required. Also, English fits the German pattern (being of that family linguistically speaking, this is unsurprising) of appending nouns together to form new words. In English these are separated by spaces still. In German they are not but it is the same construct/idea.
So English: Independence Day
Spanish: El dia de la independencia
Now this is more complicated because the verb forms in Spanish tend to be so distinct you can drop the subject eg (Yo) estoy tarde (I am late). But still "estoy" is two syllables compared to one in English ("am"). Also, some pronouns are so indistinct that they need to be qualified (eg with "a usted" or "a ella").
I'm by no means a linguistics expert so can't say what affect this has on, say, the speed of information transfer (which I expect is _roughly_ the same across languages but variances probably exist) or on poetry, songs or even puns. But I find it interesting.
Another point: what people find funny, even with those that have the same native tongue, varies culturally. There have been studies on this. For example, Americans tend to prefer humour where people get hurt (ostensibly) and just slapstick in general. This seems to explain things like The Three Stooges. Speaking as an Australian, I've never understood the appeal. But as an Australian, our humour is much closer to English humour.
Again, I make no claims about English compared to other languages.
on (1) = we (1)
trop (1) = too (1)
assez (2) = quite (1) (this one you could translate a few different ways including plutôt, pas mal, très, etc...)
printemps (2) = spring (1)
été (2) = summer (2)
hiver (2) = winter (2)
on boit (2) = we drink (2) [1]
It's also easy to come up with examples where French requires fewer syllables:
hier (2) = yesterday (3)
demain (2) = tomorrow (3)
on se voit (2, possibly 3 if you enunciate carefully) = we see each other (5)
So I think your examples from Spanish are kinda cherry-picked.
At any rate, I'm not convinced that "number of syllables" is a very useful metric, since English syllables are more complicated and take longer to utter than Spanish ones.
[1]: In the formal/standard register this would be "nous buvons" (3 syllables), but in colloquial speech you would hear "on boit" 99% of the time.
Romance languages, in particular Portuguese and Spanish, and Italian to some extent, use many types of pun-building techniques that do not depend solely on homophones: clever rhymes, heteronyms, homographs and other quasi-homonyms. Having longer words means you can embed and concatenate into portmanteaus and puns. Latin and Greek word root prefix and suffix are also rich and an infinite source of puns.
Portuguese speakers are very found of puns and specially word play. So I think pun is a more of a cultural thing, as noted in this thread by some people, than a language feature.
Here's a few Brazilian "trocadilhos" (puns and word play).
- "Fora Dilma vez!", instead of "fora de uma vez" - meaning "Oust [president] Dilma now".
- "Lula: Presidente da Silva", for "President for sure" where "da Silva" is Lula's last name but also colloquially means "for sure".
- "Filhos da Fruta", fruit shop in São Paulo. Word play with "sons of a bitch/fruit"
- "Rock in Rio", rock festival.
Spanish word play culture goes back centuries. Francisco de Quevedo for instance used this device often in his poems, and word play have been present in popular culture ever since. Here's a sample:
- "El calvario de la alopecia", a title to an article ("the calvary of hair loss"). Word play with "calvo" (bald) and "calvario" (calvary).
- "Digamelón", instead of "Dígamelo" ("hello?") when picking up the phone, a pun meaning "hello you moron".
- "Timofónica", portmanteau of "timo" (scam) and "Telefónica" (phone company).
- "Yo loco, loco, y ella loquita", (I'm crazy, she's crazier) which sounds like "Yo lo coloco, ella lo quita" (I put it in, she takes it out).
- "La Tapilla Sixtina", a tapas bar, word play with "Capilla Sixtina" (Sistine Chapel).
Hopefully that gives an idea of the possibilities that make Romance languages pun rich.
But I have to say the English and Chinese press (and readers presumably) love puns more than anyone else for even serious articles, like the OP mentions. The former gets in trouble sometimes [1], and the latter was even outlawed [2]!
[1] http://www.espn.co.uk/football/uefa-champions-league/story/1...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/28/china-media-wa...
>The assumption that puns are per se contemptible, betrayed by the habit of describing every pun not as a pun, but as a bad pun or a feeble pun, is a sign at once of sheepish docility and desire to seem superior. Puns are good, bad, and indifferent, and only those who lack the wit to make them are unaware of the fact. [0]
[0] Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 2nd Edition
For every foul pun, there is another still Fowler.
I also think that the bad-awful spectrum is missing a category: the sublime/artful pun. See Shakespeare:
>Now is the winter of our discontent / Made glorious summer by this Son of York
>Ask for me tomorrow, and you shall find me a grave man.
The application of wit seems to me to only be a positive. Humor brings joy. Adding wit to a conversation makes it strictly better.
Voltaire, in spite of his other good attributes, was a villain in this regard. He could tell lies about opponents, but he would do it wittily so that the opponents couldn't set the record straight without it seeming that they can't take a joke.
Secondly, I did consider our grandparent's comment (see the second half of my reply). Should consideration be measured in word count or something? Should I have written him a paper?
I called him out on the comment because I see such pithy writing as fundamentally intellectually dishonest. Writing your (unsupported) conclusion with the trappings of a well-known adage misrepresents your (possibly personal) opinion as something already widely believed, staving off further argument.
Clearly there are many exceptions to the above assertion. The most common being when the main purpose of the wit is not to entertain but to showcase the punner's cleverness.
Not to get bogged down by minutiae, but I'd argue that wit and ostentation are two separate things, and that it's certainly possible to practice one without the other.
But sure, I'll concede that some puns are made pretentiously.
Once they learn a bit more, they start in with unintentionally ironic wordcraft on Hacker News.
Sorry, for us in the, um, third tier of humor evolution, that is one of the most cringeworthy sentences imaginable.
Repetition is sometimes instructive.
Repetition is sometimes instructive.
This is clearly an emotive subject, and when reading this you should always remember to take a breath. Perhaps just before the words "quite clever".
Used in moderation prevents it from being too terrible.