Hacker News Reader

Except he didn't; what you describe is the media misrepresentation of the original memo.

No, it's how I and more than a dozen other people I talked to who read the memo, from front to back, in great detail, all interpreted it.

That's the thing about words: if you're not precise, they can be interpreted differently from how you intended them.

> dozen other people I talked to

That's just like the Pauline Kael apprx-quote about how "no one she knew voted Nixon - how could he possibly win?". IOW, you are already in an echo chamber.

What in your opinion, is a proper interpretation or representation of the original memo?

That the ratio of women:men in tech may never reach 1:1 even if historical biases against women are resolved (he lists some possible reasons). Therefore efforts by Google and others to improve this ratio to 1:1 at all costs can be counterproductive and discriminatory in and of themselves and should be re-examined.

That was my interpretation at least.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com