Is it time to begin discussing the desirability/effectiveness of certain policies, institutions, & popular beliefs?
Is it time to begin discussing the desirability/effectiveness of certain policies, institutions, & popular beliefs?
I hate Bigpharma as much as the next guy but just look at the statistics of children deaths in the early 1900 it's clear something changed and medicine and vaccines are among it.
Completelly inflamatory statement...
As did the development of Public Sanitation, pasteurization, electricity, transportation networks, & information networks. Many factors into a complex system, yet attribution to a few select changes that just happen to benefit certain parties.
Perhaps it's time to revisit old assumptions based on old P.R. written by parties with conflicts of interest.
> Completelly inflamatory statement...
Not completely, particularly when speaking to those in an "ideological echo chamber". It helps to desensitize people to opinions that challenge unspoken beliefs.
Also, why do we always need to capitulate to the ideologically narrow-minded? America succeeded due to Freedom of Speech & exchange of ideas.
Here's a figure for death from infectious disease by the CDC - note that antibiotics don't appreciably change the rate in decline
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4829a1.htm#fig1
just a random find - this paper from 1902 mentions the debate, too, with some descriptions of 'natural experiments' https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2401255/?page=1
Also, I am not saying that antibiotics and medications don't work - just that the story actually is more interesting than one might initially guess.
Lastly, these data discuss Western populations - I've heard the opposite may be true in poor countries.
As I said above, in the Western world, sanitation and other interventions both contributed to our current state of health. As the graph I linked to shows, antibiotics haven't appreciably changed the rate of decline of infectious disease. This is no way means that antibiotics and/or vaccines are ineffective. As you point out, looking at specific diseases shows that these interventions are helpful.
Here's the data for measles if folks are interested - there was indeed a remarkable drop after the institution of the vaccine[1].
1. https://www.quackwatch.com/03HealthPromotion/immu/immu01.htm...
This is purportedly related to the use of antibiotics to decrease bacterial sequelae of measles. I saw an academic reference to this effect but I can't find it again - here's a popular article. You'll note that this commentator ascribes some of the decrease in measles-related death to sanitation.
1. http://www.iayork.com/MysteryRays/2009/09/02/measles-deaths-...
Maybe we should listen to the scientists when they say something is bad.