We should even already be used to that style, because those are the standards that cover how SI units are supposed to be written.
So just write it as 10 000% and everyone should be happy.
We should even already be used to that style, because those are the standards that cover how SI units are supposed to be written.
So just write it as 10 000% and everyone should be happy.
Microsoft also has a dog in the space race: see their "Space Characters Design Standards". [2]
[1] https://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/chars/spaces.html
[2] https://www.microsoft.com/typography/developers/fdsspec/spac...
EDIT: Do yourself a favour and read DonHopkins's history. You'll have a good laugh.
EDIT2: That edit wasn't meant for you, Don.
I wouldn't. This looks totally bizarro to me.
It lists my country as one of those countries, and we definitely don't use space as thousands separator (we use period).
Perhaps what the table shows is just that this is the "SI style", and assumes that countries whose scientists and units follow the SI also follow this way of thousands separators, but we don't. We just use the SI units -- and even our scientists use period for the separator.
Anyway this issue could be avoided by saying 101 time increase
* 10_000
debugger invoked on a UNBOUND-VARIABLE: The variable |10_000| is unbound.
According to the Common Lisp HyperSpec, "_" is an alphabetic constituent character:http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_ad....
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_adb...