Republicans on global warming: "I don't believe the results so it must be that scientists don't know what they're talking about or they're biased."
Can I join/found a pro-science party? Anyone want to join?
Republicans on global warming: "I don't believe the results so it must be that scientists don't know what they're talking about or they're biased."
Can I join/found a pro-science party? Anyone want to join?
It would say different races have ...
shudder
differences
They might even point out that the difference between men and women, as measured in DNA differences, is bigger than the differences between humans and mice. This might result in some actual differences, and likely not just in appearance.
Nobody seems to want to hear these obvious facts, we've just collectively agreed that we're going to ignore this and even change the science to reflect political opinion.
Apparently the message that yes, sexes and races are different, and we've chosen to ignore that is considered a racist attitude itself.
my guess is that most people have a hard time distinguishing that statements about a population distribution do not mean an endorsement stereotyping.
The fact that google is well known for seeking out the most intelligence and talented, and the fact that Asians and Jews are highly "over-represented" among googlers if one were to extrapolate a random population sample as being the only SJW approved workforce, the fact that these two groups are so over-represented implies that... Jews and Asians tend towards smarter rather than dumber, which anyone paying attention has kind of noticed.
But when white people are over-represented, it implies privilege and racism, never intelligence.