Firing him just proved his point. He said that google created environment, where people whos opinions are not completely aligned with left echo chamber dogma, cant express their views safely. ... And he was fired for exactly this.
Right leaning and centrist media is not on googles side here. And seems that he plans on suing:
> Damore plans to sue Google; he had previously complained to NLRB and wants to argue that his dismissal was a revenge which would be illegal. See a Damore's defiant answer to Reuters.
Mind you if you read actual manifesto with pictures and sources, you will see he was very careful with words. He carefully sourced all controversial points and mentioned multiple times that this are not his personal views. But pro feminist blogs and media misrepresented this memo, like PS SJW culture usually does. This was enough for vocal minority to pressure google HR to fire him, wihtout actually reading real memo and relying solely on biased interpretations.
On court he has the upper hand.
Is that what the memo says? It seems to me to talk about statistical differences - a woman in tech is not representative of women in general, which seems to be the point of the memo.
> who is presumably judging my work more harshly
Should we assume historic discrimination means women will judge men more harshly? Black people will judge white people more harshly etc. I find the managerial bias argument to be a slippery slope.
> people who treat you like that
Aren't you making unwarranted assumptions about the memo author?