> women, whom he has decided are inherently incapable of working at Google.
But that's not at all what he wrote?
But that's not at all what he wrote?
Which, ironically, confirms one of his main arguments...
He then went on to explain at length that any effort to suppress this sort of opinion is the real diversity problem.
So I'd summarize that as: he believes that women are biologically not fit to work at Google, and therefore diversity programs are misguided, and therefore the real diversity problem is in not taking his unpopular opinions seriously.
Another example, East Asian people and Ashkenazi Jewish people are much smarter than gentile whites, half a standard deviation to a full standard deviation on average: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289606...
Because of this we should expect them to be over represented in cognitively demanding jobs such as engineering at Google. And this is indeed exactly what we see. Should we positively discriminate for white people? This does not mean all white people are unfit to work at Google, it just means that on average white people are less likely to have the requisite ability, though many individuals will.
The vast majority of people are _biologically unfit_ to work at Google?
Are you serious? What 100 meter sprint time do you need to get a job at Google?