This whole article is not good for his case. I stopped reading halfway because it looks like the typical crazy person rant.
What he needs to do is get proper legal counsel.
What he needs to do is get proper legal counsel.
Has he contacted the EFF or other similar organizations? What's with all this defense of anti-semetism? Someone needs to proofread this. What's the call to action? If the domain name's not going to change, fine, but get rid of the giant anus illustration for such a plea. Yeesh.
The problem is there are potential actual felony charges under discussion, related to the original computer crime warrant. While he hasn't been charged, he doesn't get a public defender. If he's charged, he gets a public defender.
If I were in his shoes, I would absolutely be getting a lawyer (and I sent him $100 toward that, and asked some friends who are lawyers to consider it).
Honestly, not getting an Arkansas Public Defender is probably a victory for him, too. I would rather represent myself than rely on AR PD to defend me in a case like this.
The fact that he can't get a public defender because no charges higher than the misdemeanors were filed against him is, like you said, a good thing. He misunderstood, and creates a conspiracy theory around it. This is likely the case with most of his other points in the essay as well.