This sounds totally insane. I Cannot believe this happens in real world.
This sounds totally insane. I Cannot believe this happens in real world.
This happens depressingly often.
"6 monts working on the equivalent of 2 weeks of estimation points"
It's really the fault of the manager for not changing something after the first 3 weeks of this.
Sometimes it's tough to be that ass and say "hey, these weren't estimated properly PM!"...but if it's your job or theirs...
Managers don't say, "So let's see who's the worst performer... it's Tom! Weird, he seems to be one of my best developers. Oh, well! The metrics say he's the worst. Off to fire Tom!"
"Best to Worst Ranking" is the most toxic and destructive environments.
Manu Cornet famous organization chart is the best example of this. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e1/%22Org_c...
If you have to let go 20% of your staff, how do you do it? You have to rank people...
It sounds like justification for a decision made for less quantitative reasons.
Yes. And the perception of objectivity from the first two points (of the parental article) helps in hiding this.Software development in the Bay Area and other tech hubs with similar (or aspiring to be similar) company profiles can be depressing.