Why capitalism can’t survive without socialism

>What we don't know yet is how to pay people for those behaviors, because many of those screenplays and books and inventions will not be able to command a sufficiently high market price, but this is where the issue of some kind of hybridization of hypercapitalism and hypersocialism must enter the discussion.

Maybe people can fund themselves with token sales on the blockchain. If the government got out of the way with all of its attempts to centrally plan complex industries, I'm confident that capital and talent would do a much more effective job of finding each other, as a result of the incentives and feedback loops built into the market mechanism.

Regulatory friction is the great barrier to economic participation by the poor. It imposes primarily fixed costs, which fall most heavily on the lower/middle class.

I like Weinstein's comments on the growth hypotheses being proven wrong. I suspect it's not correct, especially not in our era where I believe we're on the precipe of an era of much higher economic growth rates, but it's thought-provoking nonetheless.

On the other hand, "hypersocialism" sounds like a meaningless buzzword. It would be nice if he defined it.