If they are of higher quality, yes. In fact, there are plenty of useful and native applications which many just haven't discovered --- you could argue they spent far more effort on the product than marketing it. Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14748924

What incentive does any developer have to do as you say?

I'm not the one you're replying to, but as developer myself I don't want to have to put up with "this slow and bloated web shit on desktop" either. IMHO increasing the combined computing resource consumption of all your users significantly just so you can make your product a little more easily is the complete opposite of being a good developer.

The argument about it being "easier" might be questionable too --- I've been programming native GUI apps for over a decade and for the type of functionality that a lot of these web-app-packaged-with-browser monstrosities are doing, it'd probably take me far less time to write something in pure Win32 and X than download and figure out how to use Electron. Some may argue that the initial learning curve is steeper, but then after that you're a "real native coder" instead of a "web apper" and will be making far more efficient applications for everyone.