This article is what they used to call "putting the cart before the horse." She starts out with the assumption that women must have been just as influential in creating the modern Web, based on that assumption condemns this other woman (!) for her patriarchal views, and then — still working from her original assumption — offers a list of women who should have been included. The fact that none of these women had much to do with creating the Web is irrelevant, because it's an a priori fact that women deserve to be on the list.

It's basically an unintentional reductio ad absurdum.

I'm all for giving credit where credit is due. I think Ada Lovelace should be an inspiration to all hackers. But she had nothing to do with the Web. Trying to shoehorn women into a list that no woman rightfully belongs on is desperate at best and patronizing at worst.