An overdose,drug-fueled parties: The secret life of USC med school dean
latimes.com
latimes.com
However, this article seems to be trying to whip up anger not just for that particular case of depraved negligence, but more broadly for the fact that Dr. Puliafito led a hard-partying secret double life.
The puritanical impulse to hold people to super-high standards of wholesome rectitude in their private lives seems silly to me, and I think it's ultimately to the detriment of large institutions, whether universities or government or big corporations or whatever else. I'd much rather work for a highly competent CEO who indulges a few vices in her private life than a soup sandwich straight arrow, so long as the party animal keeps things professional while at work.
[edited: previous draft erroneously said he gave his companion prescription opiates, not the case]
Smells like a cover up, by both Pasadena police and USC admin. And USC seems to be gaining a reputation for cover-ups.
Agree more broadly that there's a massive double standard in terms of how drug laws are enforced between rich/white neighborhoods and poor/nonwhite ones.
The "in their private lives" part stops (not just stops - comes to a screeching halt) when we have incidents in which other people's lives are directly (and callously) endangered. By someone in a high-profile position in the medical profession, on top of that. In fact, that's precisely the point at which we star to call it a "legitimate public interest story".
So it's not a story about puritanical moralistic standards -- or about this guy's "party animal" life on the side (per se) - at all.
Reminds me of a joke I read once, where someone says "I'm shocked that Lance Armstrong was on drugs when he won the tour de france. When I was on drugs I couldn't even find my bike.".
Well it seems this guy was able to find his bike, and I can't really say I mind what he does in his private life.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-usc-dean-ethic...
> It remains unclear when top USC officials first learned about the allegations involving Puliafito. But The Times made repeated inquiries over the last 15 months about Puliafito, in some cases describing information reporters had gathered about the dean. USC’s leaders never responded to the inquiries. Numerous phone calls were not returned, emails went unanswered and a letter seeking an interview with USC President C.L. Max Nikias to discuss Puliafito was returned to The Times by courier, unopened.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-usc-dean-pasadena-o...
> “As indicated in the article, initially there was no police report made of the incident,” Mermell said. “There should have been and that was a failure on the part of our responding officer. Once this came to light, [police] undertook an appropriate investigation and ultimately the involved officer was the subject of disciplinary action.”
If he were an actor, maybe this would just make TMZ. But he's not just an actor, he's dean of a prestigious medical school. Just like Trump's tweets aren't front page news until he became president.
No, it wasn't simply a matter of his doing drugs and "hanging around" with younger women. You might want to give the article a closer read.
But it’s fucked up if he didn’t try to help that woman to save himself or protect his reputation.
Wtf is wrong with the media that they can't let this person have a private life, warts and all. Sad.