Falcon Heavy prepares for debut flight as Musk urges caution on expectations
nasaspaceflight.com
nasaspaceflight.com
There's certainly no reason to doubt him when he says it was harder than expected, but I do find it interesting that the Delta IV Heavy [1] has an essentially identical configuration and has been operational since 2004. Maybe that rocket had similar difficulties, or maybe the large number of engines on Falcon Heavy make a real difference (each Delta IV has one large engine rather than 9 small ones).
I guess I'm surprised that Spacex was surprised about the difficulty.
"The first launch of the Delta IV Heavy in 2004 carried a boilerplate payload (dummy payload), and failed to reach intended orbit. Cavitation in the liquid oxygen propellant lines caused shutdown of both boosters 8 seconds early, and the core engine 9 seconds early; this resulted in a lower staging velocity for which the second stage was unable to compensate. The payload was left in a lower than intended orbit.[6] Its first operational payload was the DSP-23 satellite, successfully launched in 2007; "