Hacker News Reader

Comment by zanny | Hacker News Reader

Golden ratio strikes again!

Historians in a millennia will probably look back at us as heathens for deviating from using the perfect rectangle to construct our screens.

View on HN

hopefully in a millennia mathemeticians will have finally convinced the world that the golden ratio really isn't special.

Nor does it make sense for a monitor. I can't remember ever wanting to arrange a bunch of windows as a square, a smaller square, a smaller square, etc.

You must not use a tiling window manager.

I must not want my wm to give me a geometric series of ever shrinking squares.

What else does it default to, if you open a new window?

Does/did make sense. European paper size (A*) are based on the golden section (so A0 Length == A1 Width and 1/2 surface A0 == surface A1 and so on).

Not quite. ISO 216 paper sizes are designed so that if you split them in half you get the same ratio (1:sqrt(2), or 1:1.414). The golden section is so that if you take a square out from one side, you get the same ratio (1:1.618).

It's special. Just because people overload it with spurious claims doesn't alter its mathematical elegance. And seeing as how it falls out naturally from geometric figures like pentagons and pentagrams, people are likely to stay interested in it for as long as humans have 5 fingers.

Hopefully historians in the future will be sufficiently advanced that when they look back on us 16:10 ratio displays won't rate the top 500 things they are horrified by.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com