"no deterrent whatsoever"?
I really don't think this is correct. It may not be a foolproof deterrent, but it's certainly a deterrent.
I don't like when this argument is trotted out for gun control and I don't like it here.
I really don't think this is correct. It may not be a foolproof deterrent, but it's certainly a deterrent.
I don't like when this argument is trotted out for gun control and I don't like it here.
Also, with guns, it's you, there, holding the gun, so it can be enforced.
With drones, you could be in a moving car a mile away. How does that get enforced?