> False dichotomy: GNU Emacs can simply not ship with a git porcelain.
False dichotomy: The FSF can drop their requirement for onereous copyright assignments and instead trust the GPL to do its job.
False dichotomy: The FSF can drop their requirement for onereous copyright assignments and instead trust the GPL to do its job.
It's not as great as magit, but it works (and it has you to learn very little).
I think this comment on the Lwn-article really highlights how bizarre this has all turned out:
> GNU began as a project to replace proprietary software with free one, and now lives on as a project to replace free software with free software.
I think that about sums it up. (And I say that as a passionate Emacs-user)