>I use comcast or Nothing, there is no other option for me
That is unfortunate... not the fact that you don't have an option... but the fact that you are on the side of the argument which denies you that option.
I'm done here. Good luck!
That is unfortunate... not the fact that you don't have an option... but the fact that you are on the side of the argument which denies you that option.
I'm done here. Good luck!
How will Regulating ISP's under title I give me more providers? Title II regulation could if the FCC would do it force the Comcast to resell their service wholesale like in the 1990's but nothing under Title I provides the FCC the ability to do that
So explain to me exactly how Rural America that barely gets 1 provider will magically have multiple providers wanting to run separate infrastructure to their 5 homes
>I'm done here.
Yes you are... you have lost the argument, your are done here because you know this. Go tell your comcast overlords you did you best and collect your silver
However, one can easily choose to never use Facebook and not lose quintillionth of the information available on the internet. Facebook or any other such service is one of a quintillion of end-nodes that you can reach on the internet.
Comcast is the choke through which your internet connectivity comes through, and you are proposing to allow increased manipulative power to them.
As I have mentioned earlier, the only power they have is they can block access to specific site. They can't actually know or filter out what the user sees.
>you are proposing to allow increased manipulative power to them.
OK tell me a realistic case how they could use the "manipulative powers" thus gained to harm the end users.