Librarians Call on W3C to Rethink Its Support for DRM

I dunno, working life of the author seems fair to me at least, if not life of the author, or "life of the author or 50 years, whichever lasts longer". If people love your work enough to keep buying it, why should you not get to keep profiting off of it for at least as long as you're alive? Considering people sometimes lose the ability to do work or also have families that depend on them, it doesn't seem so unreasonable to me. Now, these time periods that last what feels like 200 years, definitely absurd.

I don't mind the notion of a copyright entering into the hands of a company, either, but if a copyright was originally an individual's, and then transfers to a company (either through purchase or through contract, etc.), I think the copyright should expire after about 10 to 20 years. Let the company make money off of it for a decent amount of time (otherwise there's not much incentive to buy it), and then send it to the public domain.

I could have sworn that Netflix had an open source library for sending encrypted responses to the browser that had to be decrypted with EME. I can't find it now though.

The cdm api in chrome at least allows for decrypting raw bytes. I'm not sure how it's exposed in javascript.