Hacker News Reader

More descriptive is Tokamak rather than ITER, since ITER is still going to have burning DT plasma in 2035 (at the earliest, according to article).

View on HN

So it should say "Tokamak fusion energy pushed back beyond 2050"? I'm worried that this will provoke more objections. The combo of highly technical + controversial makes it hard to get a title like this right.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com