Hacker News Reader

Comment by goatlover | Hacker News Reader

Self-awareness isn't the fundamental issue with consciousness. It's the colors, sounds, tastes, feels, etc. Why are those a problem? Because the physical world isn't colored, doesn't taste like anything, doesn't feel like anything, etc.

So somehow, a physical system - the brain, creates or is correlated with those conscious sensations. Explaining this in terms of physics, function, computation, math, etc is hard because those fields lack any such sensations. An equation doesn't feel heat or see red, nor do atoms bumping around in the void. So from whence do those conscious sensations come from? Do they spontaneously emerge somehow from the complexity of a nervous system? Is the right sort of flow of electricity result in the smell of a rose? Is it the right algorithm that implements consciousness, if you just arrange the bits just right?

View on HN

The best I've been able to come up with is that what we think of as "color" or "sound" (and similar) are in fact our brain's model of those aspects of the physical world. Of course you're not experiencing the physical world directly, but your brain does have a representation of the world based on its sensory inputs.

You might be interested by the Sensorimotor Contingencies theory of O'Regan. Here's a summary [0]. I find it really convincing. He also wrote a book if you want to go deeper in the subject (the final draft version is available on his website [1]).

0: http://www.whatfeelingislike.net/tiki-index.php?page=The+Sen... 1: http://nivea.psycho.univ-paris5.fr/

My argument is that they do emerge, though not spontaneously. They are the emergent result of the neural abstraction hierarchy that the brain forms based on the sensory input it receives, and its own sense of that sensation. The "feel" of something is therefore a meta-sensation, a sense of what a sense is like, in comparison with another, within a neural abstraction that models the brain itself.

Like you said, colors, tastes, sounds, etc. aren't "real". They themselves are emergent phenomenon. A colour is arrangement of electromagnetic radiation, a sound is an arrangement of air molecules. And radiation and matter are themselves the emergent result of the interaction of even simpler forces. Often, the nature of the emergent phenomenon seems inexplicably complex in comparison with the basic interactions that give rise to it.

If you examine intelligent life, you can see that it sits at the top of a pyramid of emergent complexity, reaching down through biology, chemistry and physics into quantum physics. It would be very strange indeed if, at the very top of this pyramid, there was another complex phenomenon that somehow did not arise from the interaction of simpler parts beneath it.

I think I disagree. The hard part is understanding why we have a sense of "self" one that can independently perceive it's place among the solar system and beyond.

The "colors, sounds, tastes, feels, etc" that you refer to can be seen as sensors that perceive narrow views of the various spectrums created by the energy bouncing around in the physical universe.

Examples:

- Hot vs. cold for a human is entirely different that hot vs. cold for a star.

- Color, from our perspective, is the spectrum of light that we need to utilize to effectively interact with our environment (different animals need and perceive different spectrums of light).

- Sound is a vibration that propagates as a [..] mechanical wave of pressure and displacement, through a transmission medium such as air or water. (taken from wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com