"The versions of Unix are numbered in a logical sequence: 5, 6, 6PWB, 7, 4.1, III, 4.3, V, and V.3." -- quoted from memory from The Unix-Haters Handbook
So you see, they're following long-standing industry practice :-)
So you see, they're following long-standing industry practice :-)
Surface Pro. Surface Pro 2 (note: Surface Pro is now surface pro 1!), Surface Pro 3, Surface Pro 4, Surface Pro. By the way we also have Surfaces (1, 2, and 3?) as well as Surface Books, and Surface Laptops! :D
Android: here's a bunch of fucking candy
OS: here's a bunch of fucking animals. By the way, sometimes people call your macbooks 10,1 or some shit.
whose initials follow alphabetical order
Java 1.4 -> Java 5.
(Yes, I'm a Java programmer)
``` >dotnet Microsoft .NET Core Shared Framework Host Version : 1.1.0 Build : 928f77c4bc3f49d892459992fb6e1d5542cb5e86 ```
``` >dotnet --version 1.0.0-preview2-1-003177 ```
The version numbers aren't necessarily weird, but the versioning sure is.
Disclaimer: MS Employee who uses Dotnet, but doesn't work on it.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standar...
I should probably print it out
I was in version hell yesterday, targeting a standard (1.5) because I thought it would help me run as .NET Core 1 whilst supporting a 4.6.2 .NET Framework dll but that broke something else. It was a juggling game of trade offs