Hacker News Reader

Wouldn't be surprising. As it turns out, lots of businesses run on Microsoft technologies.

I think the poster was questioning why they weren't running a more recent version of Exchange such as 2013/2016

My company uses 2010 as well. It's regularly patched and supported for another two or three years. Why fix what's not broken?

(Yes, I know Clinton used 2010. Her admin was a dumbass though).

What were you expecting? GMail?

Actually, yes

Yeah, they do. Turns out the product actually works, who knew!

That's both disturbing and sad.

So does Amazon and most major tech firms not named Google. There's literally no better alternative for a large enterprises.

I mean that it's seven years out of date. That part.

It would also be nice if there was an enterprise alternative to Exchange that isn't Google Apps, but hey, dreams.