Amid Unprecedented Controversy, W3C Greenlights DRM for the Web
eff.org
eff.org
I wonder if there is a case to be made here under the ADA in the US. By making it impossible for someone to use their own assistive measures, and by not providing their own assistive technologies, companies that employ DRM are essentially closing their services off to a significant portion of the disabled population.
Pretending like the W3C could actually change anything by not ratifying this is ignoring the reality of the marketplace.
don't they all follow https://whatwg.org/ over W3C after W3C wanted to lock in HTML5 rather than a living web standard that evolves with the web
The reason it was implemented is that Microsoft and Google both also make and sell the DRM systems that EME requires, so they of course shipped it first. It's hard to compete against a browser that works with Netflix when yours doesn't, so everyone else shipped it too.