Show HN: Artpip – 4k fine art for your desktop
artpip.com
artpip.com
There is one thing though: I also have LittleSnitch installed and it shows that Artpip often tries to connect to direct IPs.
Personally, I don't like giving apps permissions to connect to some random IPs.
Would be nice if it used something more meaningful, like images.artpip.com.
I'll take a look into what's causing that.
Artpip started off as a side project to help me learn a bit more about art in general and has grown from there. It's been great fun making it and I have learnt A LOT about art history in the process. I can now recognise a lot of painters and have got pretty good at dating/categorising paintings (compared to before, at least!).
Happy to answer any questions.
create this key with a string value called 'LockScreenImage', this string should point directly to an image, i.e: C:\.... HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Personalization
throwaway because of not wanting to get arrested for hacking the registry
If anyone else wants to tinker with it https://gist.github.com/Connicpu/8b092b2c0ad539573b893dbca54...
The author has posted about it on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/windowsphone/comments/5yjdpp/city_a...
Don't know why they still keep it in preview.
I like the idea, though. I don't really look at my desktop very often, but this might give me that push.
Question on the project, though. Whenever I step away from my laptop for a minute, I have a hot corner to display a screen saver. Any way of using this as a substitute for the screen savers, so it'll just cycle art?
I've also enjoyed Theories of Modern Art by Chipp [1]. Gives a great insight into the mind of the artist.
[1] http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/93073.Theories_of_Modern_...
Use an older second monitor that you have laying around. Its proximity to the main monitor will place the paintings right in your viewfield, but your work on the main monitor will be unaffected. When you take a breather you can enjoy art.
I'm using it to power my ghetto live painting - http://i.imgur.com/bNDEZTu.jpg
If you make a collection that fit a screen or with proper cropping and have each individual user create it's own account it would save you the bandwidth :-)
Thanks for the link though, I'll look into including some of the imagery.
The Pro version was only launched last week, so still early days!
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/artstation-discove...
Re: Art history - It would be great to see a blurb about the artwork in the app to put some context to the work. eg: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/beta/asset/fanatics...
An important feature was that I engraved the name of the author and painting on the images themselves in order to remember what I like most (hint: Hermitage is full of excellent portraits of russian aristocracy). After some time, visual detail begins to open up and art appreciation increases. We just need exposure.
It would be really awesome if it worked like this:
sudo pip install artpip
artpip install starry-nightYour command line app is actually a pretty cool idea, too.
curl http://artpip.com/api/featured |
jq ".artworks[0].url" |
xargs -n1 curl > /tmp/wall.jpg &&
feh --bg-fill /tmp/wall.jpg
via crontab every morning or so. But the dev(s) might not be happy about it (although the image itself is downloaded from Wikimedia, not artpip.com). #!/bin/bash
curl -s http://artpip.com/api/featured |
jq -r '.artworks | map(.url) | join("\n")' |
shuf -n 1 |
xargs curl -s > /tmp/wall.jpg &&
feh --bg-fill /tmp/wall.jpg jq ".artworks[0].url"
with jq ".artworks[$((RANDOM % 5))].url"
…at least in bash and zsh. But your version will work better if there ever are more (or less) than 5 featured items.The bandwidth costs have become noticeable for me, so that's something to watch out for.
One of your recently featured artworks (https://www.artpip.com/artwork/57a4cf0970f12152abacdf78) seems to be owned by the Van Gogh Museum and needs a license to be printed. If I wanted to order a print of that, do you have the correct license?
See [1] for an example of wikimedia's position on licencing:
'The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".'
Also, it's a $9.99 one-off payment, not monthly. Serving tens of thousands of high-res images a day adds up, so there's some extra paid features there for those that particularly enjoy the app and feel like supporting the project.
[1] https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Van_Gogh_-_Starry_...
I can imagine a situation where an artwork is copyrighted but someone takes a photo of it and uploads it to Wikimedia saying 'here, use my photo'.. but they don't have rights over the original. Which would be like camming a film in the cinema and saying 'the original is copyrighted but my reproduction is PD'.
Not trying to knock the idea - I'm an artist myself and think anything that helps spread and communicate art is great - good on you. Just something to keep an eye on.
I've seen countless scummy stock photo sites selling NASA imagery for ridiculous prices (think $200 per image) when it's all completely free in the first place.
1. Click on the menu bar icon 2. Click on the "Show artpip" 3. Wait for the app to load 4. Click on the fav button.
Too many steps...
I had a startup that was working on easy art access. Essentially A Spotify for Art with both public domain and contemporary art. Decided the market just isn't there. But may do a Kickstarter of the device or run a simplified version of the software people could access for free or very cheap and see if any interest develops.
To elaborate on a tough situation, Google does show some contemporary art in its Chromecast rotations but the artist is not reimbursed for it. It's all done in name of publicity. Companies working in this area have a market on one side of artists who have little money, so you are a cost to them even to digitize their works. And on payer side you have numerous free art resources from museums. And Google who uses it as a culture talking point and just-good-enough feature in their products.
I think there are several markets in art delivery but it will take connections, money, and luck to prise it open.
Curious about this. I love art and visit musuems regularly.
The first time I saw a van Gogh at d'Orsay I got goose pimples. A flat 2D image on my laptop or a TV does not come anywhere close to the experience of seeing the painting itself.
Aren't musuems the best 'art delivery' mechanism there is?
With a 4K screen (even the super-cheap one I bought 3 years ago) and sufficient scanning resolution you can zoom in and see the paint clinging to individual fibers of canvas. You can achieve closeness and magnification far beyond what you can at an art museum. You'll never get that close to a real van Gogh, breathing on it and with a magnifying glass!
My thinking is education and exploration. There's a to be said for volume in art viewing too. With the TV+software experience, you can construct progressions of an artist's work, quickly build visual trees showing change and relationship of art genres. You can visualize the _genre_ and _time_ in a way few can at an art museum.
Also think about AR and VR experiences. In the light form, imagine watching curator talks when they can serve up high-resolution images and zoom in to specific features, or highlight and "pull out" sections side by side. Or superimpose their hands to visually guide your eye as it's discussed.
That's where I see the future of art in digital form: bringing it into the home and school, and augmenting the experience within the museum. TV brings vast scale and new presentation abilities, which I think will complement the power and complexity of individual static works.
Then, there is also the ability to deliver art that is not static, which I think will develop soon. Where the image itself slowly changes either by artistic effort (strictly dictated change) and algorithmic. I imagine a Kandinsky-like work that changes subtly over minutes, hours, or weeks.
I'm actually not a big art enthusiast myself. But it turns out I'm extremely passionate about art presentation and how access and exploration can be magnified.
Dang, now I want to pick this up again. I'd be interested in talking more, if you are. I love the subject.
For some demos I used cheap Android-powered dongles (like the Amazon Fire Stick, but wide-open rootable Android) to make a plug-and-play display device. With some small work it would be a fun Kickstarter.
An 'an art' app! :)