This is the fallacy of percentages rather than absolutes.
He got 6 offers.
How is that bad?
You're kind of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
This is the fallacy of percentages rather than absolutes.
He got 6 offers.
How is that bad?
You're kind of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Sending 1300 applications and attending 70 interviews feels like a huge waste of time.
EDIT: Also, is sending an application still a thing? Being LinkedIn user for a while I really stopped watching job boards and just rely on offers sent directly to me.
As Drucker used to say.. "focus first on being effective, then on being efficient"
How tightly that correlates to "good" is pretty debatable.
Admittedly, in the context of recruiters, it could be different, but doesn’t have to be. Personal relationships are a strong signal for many people.
I've never heard of a job without an interview.
Regarding the offer that required no interview - turned out hiring manager and me had some mutual friends, so he just reached out to one of them to get an opinion about me.
For the other offer I had an interview, but it was very short - I think my resume speaks for itself, so it was more like loose talk about my previous projects than real evaluation of my technical knowledge.
How does that work? Did they already know about you and/or have direct evidence of your work?