> he just wants that beach.
He wants to win the principle to control the access to the beach. Sorry to be pedantic, but if he would be living there full-time, he might have an argument, but he doesn't.
He wants to win the principle to control the access to the beach. Sorry to be pedantic, but if he would be living there full-time, he might have an argument, but he doesn't.
Which is much worse than just wanting the beach, because he's fighting a battle to set a precedent that is directly contrary to the public good.