Why not?
My expectation is that the site does the templating on the client then. And my experience with websites that do that is that they load slow, behave sludgy and suffer from all kinds of display errors.This might be a worthwile tradeoff to quickly build a highly interactive realtime interface. But for a newspaper? As a user I would be very much turned off to endure all that just to read an article.
If the user is on any hardware from the past 7 years, a React developer would have to do some distinctly bad programming to make it behave sludgy. Any poor performance is likely to be from the same things that make a classic static page slow: large media files and tracking scripts.
As a sidenode, it does feel sludgy:
- Scroll is not smooth.
- It does not adapt well to different browser sizes
- After a few seconds the page "jumps down"
But the reason might simply be the overkill of JS,animations, overlapping elements (like the static header), ads, dynamically loaded stuff and other crap. When I turn off JS, some of the problems go away.
A lot of this "JS is slow, what happened to good old HTML and CSS, get off my lawn" stuff is simply confirmation bias.
You could even write an entirely server-rendered web application, or a static website, in React should you be so inclined. In fact, I do the latter for my (very simple) personal site at https://davnicwil.com!
Nothing about React obliges you to do client rendering, a SPA app, or anything complex at all. It's, at the end of the day, just a view rendering library.