However, with chip transactions there are multiple calls for different payment processing flows. For example, a transaction could require 5 round trip request responses from the chip to the payment process meaning 5x the time required.
However, with chip transactions there are multiple calls for different payment processing flows. For example, a transaction could require 5 round trip request responses from the chip to the payment process meaning 5x the time required.
Samsung pay even cuts out any knowledge of the reader, just gives a virtual number to the credit card mag reader.
The main practical difference is that you can't update the on-card data depending on the transaction outcome, since the card isn't there any more.
Paying for the bus for me is offline, whereas in a supermarket it's processed online
The other kind, AIUI, are indeed the same as the chip transactions, with all that entails.
e: Other posts seem to say that all the contactless transactions are offline, which means no multiple expensive round trips upstream either way, so nevermind.
IIRC it should come down to 0 or 1 roundtrips, depending on the amount and risk profile - in most cases you do an offline authorization where only the chip is involved to verify the txn, PIN(if applicable) and limits; and if you can't do that, then you send an online authorization, get a response, and that's it. There's extra communication afterwards in the workflow, but that happens after the customer has left and has no impact on customer-observed latency.