Even as an experienced Noscript user and web developer the unscripted experience was annoying to manage
What can be done to improve the situation? Nothing. Most developers simply don't care.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/toggle-javascript/...
The biggest obstacle is, as others have said, some websites simply do not work.
The biggest benefit to turning it off, though, is that sites finish loading much much quicker. Take Stereogum. Without JavaScript, you save yourself from a sluggish mess of a website that, really, is just text and images.
My default is to browse with NoScript actively disabling most JS. I'm happy with at least 90% of my website interactions.
Here's the full extent of my permanently whitelisted websites:
apple.com
cdn-apple.com
edmunds-media.com
edmunds.com
newegg.com
wikimedia.org
wikipedia.org
yahoo.com
ycombinator.com
yimg.com
In addition, selectively doing View->Page Style->No Style often displays content that would otherwise require JS.For most of the rest I just say Fuck It and move on to something else. There are plenty of other sites out there, and life is too short.
If you "disable HTML" the web will be broken, expect the same for Javascript.
Trying to build every single thing in a way that gracefully falls back in the absence of Javascript is often extremely difficult (if no impossible) and always very expensive.
I think last time I checked less than 5% of global internet users had javascript disabled. Kind of like supporting IE6, the cost is just not worth it.
check the uMatrix extension. Living with it perfectly for months now. absolute no exceptions on any site. only allow what I trust and need.
The new trend is single page web apps and websites with heavy use of JavaScript and they don't really work if you disable JS.
So it depends on which websites you usually visit. Depending on that you might or might not require JS.
In such a situation your access is prevented and the usefulness of a noscript tag is limited.