No, you clearly did not say that the article
may be full of misdirection. You very emphatically stated that the article
certainly contained misdirection, but did not deign to tell us mere mortals what that misdirection might be:
"The answer: this is war propaganda. There are no real facts here, only half-truths and mis-direction." [Emphasis mine.]
Calling everything around you propaganda may seem like an easy way to look smarter than everyone else, but it is a painfully transparent move when you can't back it up with substance. It's even worse when you try to pretend you weren't doing it.