Overall a bigger disaster than the Snowden leaks, but it was too embarassing to explain. No one got punished for letting it happen.
Overall a bigger disaster than the Snowden leaks, but it was too embarassing to explain. No one got punished for letting it happen.
Governmental record keeping of this sort is literally one of the first uses for computers.
Example... oh, there's lots of people with TS clearances in this little town in the midwest. Maybe there's something to that. Let's check it out.
One centralized location that you can phone in with some smart authentication system, human workers for the rest of it. Getting cleared already takes a while (weeks or longer) so what's the huge problem with keeping the classified stuff actually safe?
At this point I don't feel especially confident that any of this stuff is going to stay secure given the prevalence of leakers and hacks. The choice is store on a computer and accept that it is going to be leaked at least occasionally or do not store it on a computer.
If the OPM computers currently average 1 query per second (a number I'm pulling out of thin air, but one I'd guess was conservative). Even if you restrict that to 8X5 business hours access (an efficiency loss in itself) you have 2400 phone calls to answer and then traverse of the gigantic document store we created above.
I think this is one of those cases where people have very bad intuitive understanding of the scale of the data and what dealing with this kind of data looks like in a physical form.
There was a story a while back that the Russians had reverted to typewriters and paper files.
https://www.nsa.gov/about/cryptologic-heritage/historical-fi...
It turns out that none of those problems is a very good indicator of insider threat. Hardly anyone gets blackmailed, all the big ones were volunteers. But the paranoia gripping the military at the moment will cause crazy damage. Kind of like a bear being bitten by fire ants, slashing itself all over.