So if these candidates are so unsophisticated and misunderstand, do you really want to hire them anyway?
Maybe you should highlight in the interview process (if you do an interview with them) the potential in regards to equity, so on and so forth?
Maybe you should highlight in the interview process (if you do an interview with them) the potential in regards to equity, so on and so forth?
I'd still want to hire than engineer though. But when they decline, I'd rather them not tell me it's because the other offer was $10K higher. I'd rather they tell me they see more room for personal growth, more interesting technology, etc. There are reasons to decline, and that's okay -- but $10K is a really stupid one.
A great engineer is not expected to know how their impact
on a 25 person company will be different than a 200
person company. Moreover a great engineer may not yet
know that not having that impact may be a really
important loss to them.
A great engineer had bloody well know how their impact will be different, and they'd damn well know how that difference will affect them. Whatever kind of engineer you are referring to is most certainly not great and, worse, they are the kind you should strive to weed out of your hiring process before they end up getting hired and creating a lot of grief for both themselves and the company. Among other things, they have a strong tendency to bring to the table solutions that are mismatched in scale, complexity, delivery style, etc. relative to what would serve the company best.(your 10k point is entirely valid, of course.)