this isn't me saying "Now's the time everybody! Pour your entire retirement fund into SNAP before it's too late!" it's an admonishment for the short-sellers sucking in the inevitable negative media headlines around any hot IPO as fact.
this isn't me saying "Now's the time everybody! Pour your entire retirement fund into SNAP before it's too late!" it's an admonishment for the short-sellers sucking in the inevitable negative media headlines around any hot IPO as fact.
Snapchat's total revenue for 2016 was $405M, with net loss of $514M.
The two are not even remotely comparable in terms of financial soundness.
The last time Amazon was worth less than $20 billion was back in March of 2007 [1]. The month prior, they announced results for FYE 2016 [2]. That year, Amazon had net sales of $10.7 billion on which they made a profit of $190 million (page 47). Amazon's operations, meanwhile, produced over $700 million of cash from operations (page 46).
Snap shows $150 million of Q1 2017 revenues. They managed to turn that into a $2.2 billion loss [3]. Next to that, the $150 million of cash their operations lost looks like chump change. (Snap incurred a $2 billion one-time non-cash expense in Q1, so the revenue and cash-from-operations numbers are better for comparison purposes.)
Keep in mind, too, that $1 in March 2007 bought as much as $1.19 bought in March earlier this year [4].
[1] http://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/market-cap/ama...
[2] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000119312507...
[3] https://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASNAP&fstype=ii&ei=f_...
To be fair, a big chunk of that loss was due to many years worth of equity-based compensation (stock options) all booked at once.