Windows93 SP2
windows93.net
windows93.net
Note: units intentionally left blank
The site in general is a beautiful work of art, a great blend of attention to detail with comedy of computing in that era.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna - tl;dr is this iconic test picture for computer imaging was a cropped Playboy centerfold from 1972. I've just finished a PhD which included a fair bit of image processing, but I was unaware of the story behind this iconic image.
What about people in countries or workplaces where "unacceptable" is a far broader and more oppressive net than "contains nudity", or places where nudity is fine? For whom do we annotate the internet? Maybe you should just disable auto-load of images in your browser or install a nudity filter.
This is insane.
Calling this insane is... insane
I think its a cool site. I was thinking of showing it to high school students I teach summer courses to, but its probably not appropriate for them. That's why labels are helpful - nude images weren't ok in schools or work in the 'old culture' either. As art or entertainment (as this website in general was intended), I think there is wide license to the creator, but I think there is still some duty to a website creator to consider what else people might want to use it for.
Am I the only person baffled by this? Does the world now revolve around every passer-by?
Why is the creator's duty to do anything other than satisfy his own artistic urge? Why does what someone else wants to do with his art matter? He kindly provides access, he isn't forcing anyone to view it. Where do you draw the line on what concessions he should make for someone else? What sort of absurd concessions might someone demand?
What you want sounds like a cascade of chilling effects, self-censorship, and second-guessing.
Also it's odd that you think a bare ass is not appropriate for for high school. How long do you imagine the psychological scarring from that might afflict them? At what age do you think it is appropriate to set foot in an art museum?
Bizarre.
I could not disagree more with this opinion. The creator presumably hosts this website on her own dime & invested the time and effort to create this piece of art - and you are connecting to their server, free of charge. I don't see how you could reasonably claim that they have a "duty" to do anything.
You're right that an image of a nude woman would be make this unacceptable in a school setting - however, it is your duty to vet the content that you show in class, not the other way around.
Finally, I don't see what educational purpose this would serve - as it's not like this is actually an OS, perhaps as an example of html5/js programming or nostalgia. In fact the whole thing is a JS app, so there is nothing stopping you from running it locally, where you can edit to your heart's content. Ironically the first JS file I clicked on (desktop.js) contains the shortcut definitions for the desktop.
As an educational purpose - my idea would be mainly to show it as a fun start to a discussion around product design evolution, computing history, and emulators. The kids I teach were born about a decade after this era of computing, and it would be interesting to see what they perceive to be similar and different. Most of these students have done very little or no coding themselves so the implementation isn't relevant for this use.
I don't think an artist has a duty to anyone but themselves, especially on the internet. Should medical devices be designed so that they don't harm people? Definitely. But the factor there is that you're actively selling/distributing it to the public - or at the very least, you are making certain guarantees about the function of the device.
This website/artwork makes no such guarantees and as such I don't see how you can reasonably expect that it should tailored to any specific audience. Again, in the time that you and I have spent commenting on this - you could have either PM'd a mod to add a NSFW tag to the title, or modified the site itself to suit your needs - that's what's awesome about the internet.
Title: RPG MO
(Don't leave a space before iframe in the command)
I guess it's an in-joke about people leaving IRC-clients running in persistent shell-sessions and never checking in.
That said, it can be a lot of fun :)
Is this open source? So we could see how it was made?
Accidental "works best in browser X" 90s reference right there.
I find Safari superior to every other browser on any platform in every possible metric except for dev tools, which took a nose dive when they ditched the open source WebKit one for this calamity.
I can't really disagree with you, but Safari is exclusive to macOS...
And it was. Is was also closed source and had its own ideas of what standards mean (even though its “version” of the box model actually makes more sense and it's generally preferred by most developers today. Oh yeah, and Ajax.)
Webkit, on the other hand, is open source and a huge proponent of standards compliance.
>I find Safari superior to every other browser on any platform in every possible metric except for dev tools
I could remove nearly 15% of my CSS if I stopped supporting Safari at work and I wouldn't need a hundred different quirky workarounds to make the sites look even remotely how they're supposed to look. It fights me every inch of the way and then has some of the worst dev tools for debugging where any issues are.
I'd rather support IE8 for eternity if it means I never have to write another `@media screen and (min-color-index:0) and(-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) {}` in my CSS again.
I do get an ocasional glitch with Firefox, but it's very rare.
Perhaps if you described the problems you experienced instead of the hacks you are using to identify Safari this could be a more fruitful conversation.
Safari is a freaking amazing browser, lots of people use it by choice.
>I'd rather support IE8 for eternity…
I don't think you know what you're saying.
Apologies, but offhand I can only think of flexbox issues (specifically related to wrap/min-width, which has been fixed in version 11) and with interactive form validation (which was only just fixed in version 10 or 10.1). I run into various issues when testing on iPhones and the largest section of edits caught in any internal QC are always iPhone/Safari related. With relative certainty nowadays - if it works in Firefox, it works in Chrome and Edge. But then I always need to write some workaround or another for Safari.
The biggest issue is that even when these bugs are fixed - I still need to support them for an extended period of time because for whatever godforsaken reason, Safari updates are tied together with operating system updates. Want the newest Safari? Buy a new iPhone. It's the Windows XP/IE8 problem. Where IE8 had to be supported only because many users were still using XP and couldn't upgrade to IE9 even if they wanted to.
However, you can run the latest browser and OS (and most people do) on a 5 year old device, which is about as much as the battery will last anyway. The situation is much worse on Android.
OH BOY do I know your pain.
Ah well, it's not like those XP machines that the NHS loves so much were an attack vector in a recent, prolific cyber attack, no no.
- Half Life 3
- Defrag <3.
- Running Windows93 inside Windows93 inside Windows93 inside Windows93...
A work of art, indeed. Kudos!
now it's crashed and won't reload.
is there a work around for my workflow?
fair enough.
Then I realized everything is written with web technology.
That would be very impressive, considering that Windows 93 never existed.
It's also quite buggy (chrome/linux) which adds to the whole Windows 9x feeling. Not sure if intentional but well done anyhow!
Uncheck that box and you'll have a chance :D
I wonder how many hours I could waste looking for more Easter eggs ;]
Nice :)
Given that kind of zealotry, it irks me that you can launch an infinite amount of nested "Virtual PCs". Obviously it makes for some fun screenshots and is technically impressive in itself, but Windows early on never allowed you to run Virtual PC inside Virtual PC. So this is clearly wrong!
In short, not considering OCD, where do I file the bug-report? :)
Curious.
I'd like to throw some event handlers on "Puke Data" to allow changes to the dsp graph.
Otherwise, kudos to the devs for creating this amazing work of art!
It was one of the things I very quickly disabled upon new installations :)
[0] http://windowsitpro.com/security/device-names-crash-win9598
:(
Serious hard work went into this site.
MANIFESTO.lnk42
3d.lnk42
Arena 93.lnk42
...snip...
>~/desktop dir
dir is not defined
interesting