What will `impl Trait` do, for us Rust-interested onlookers?
fn foo() -> impl Trait {
means "this function returns something that implements the Trait trait, but I'm not gonna tell you what that concrete type is."This is primarily useful in two cases: first, in an effort for static dispatch, some types can get really long. For example, imagine you wanted to return an iterator of some kind, like this:
foo.iter().map(|x| x + 1).filter(|x| x % 2 == 0)
the type of this is something like Filter<Map<Iter<'_, {integer}>, [closure@<anon>:2:27: 2:36]>, [closure@<anon>:2:45: 2:59]>
which is pretty gross. First of all, you'll notice the type `Filter<Map<Iter`, as you keep adapting the iterator, you get more types. With iterators it's normally not huge, but if you're using Tokio or Diesel, it can get very bad. Here's a type error I ran into recently with Diesel https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6l_OwSXAAA_Fmo.jpg:largeSo, we could write
fn foo() -> impl Iterator<Item=i32> {
and be done, no matter how many adapters we use. In current Rust, you can do this: fn foo() -> Box<Iterator<Item=i32>> {
but now you've introduced a heap allocation and dynamic dispatch; impl Trait has no allocations and statically dispatches.The second bit is also present in that type, which is this bit
[closure@<anon>:2:27: 2:36]
Closures have an anonymous type in Rust, and so you cannot write a function that returns a closure without using a Box like above. impl Trait will fix that, by letting you write fn foo() -> impl Fn(i32) -> i32 {
or whatever the type of the closure is.The latest RFC is https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1951 ; it was in several.
This is true for your specific example, but in the interest of completeness there are cases where such a thing is possible. The full story is that you can't name the closure's type, so you can only write the type signature in certain cases. For example, the following function returns a stack-allocated closure just fine today (with example usage to prove it):
fn foo<F: Fn(i32)->i32>(bar: F) -> F {
bar
}
fn main() {
let x = |y| { y + 2 };
let z = foo(x);
z(5);
}
This is mostly pedantry, though, because it's true in that the majority of the time that you want to return a closure it's a closure that was created within that function, not passed in. This is where `impl Trait` is crucial. foo :: a -> (forall b. Show b => b)
from Haskell?