> One source says “quite a bit” of the new round was used to acquire the secondary shares of Discord staffers, with this person expressing concern that liquidity has come too soon for those employees, considering that Discord was founded in 2012.
>liquidity has come too soon for those employees
How is this a bad thing? Didn't we all agree that golden handcuffs are a terrible way to lock in employees?
The number of employees they have working on what looks like a simple app is staggering.