Those are my options, so I'm stuck with Comcast.
It's amazing what a difference competition makes; I pay the same price today ($40/mo) for 50 Mbps from RCN as I did a month ago for 3 Mbps from Comcast. Regulation cannot come soon enough; we as a tech community must do all we can to oust that corporate capitalist tool Ajit Pai from the FCC.
Federal regulation trumping (or not, as it were) state xxxxxxxxxx [edit out "regulation"; I meant to type "legislation"] that had been purchased and manipulated by large, private ISP's (the Bell babies, Comcast et al.) to eliminate competition.
Note further that those big ISP's often secured substantial (i.e. enormous) tax breaks and other incentives, in return for agreeing to "universal broadband deployment" in the relevant state/community's service area. They have almost universally reneged on their side of these agreements, sometimes e.g. lobbying the state legislature to let them out of their side of the agreement almost before the ink is dry on their signature to it.
Going back in time, early trunk capacity was to a significant extent government built and government owned. There wouldn't have been an "Internet" without the Feds. And, once opened up, they kept access on a rather equal footing. This might not have all been "codified" regulation -- though I guess that and/or a set of "operating rules" grew somewhat organically. But it certainly controlled and set precedent.
So, both presently and in the past, "regulation" has actually fostered competition.
And yeah, the corporate lawyer is a giant tool. Quelle surprise!
As long as you can download 20+GB/hour you can get multiple HD streams faster than you can watch them and not much else needs that kind of bandwidth.