Mass surveillance provides unparalleled power to those who control it. It's unprecedented in all of human history. I don't believe humanity knows how to safely handle such power at this point.
One of the most fundamental concerns is the fact that, once collected, the data is vulnerable to being misappropriated or weaponized for the entirety of its existence, possibly for many decades or longer. By that point, laws may have changed significantly and the entire political climate could be drastically different.
Imagine being automatically put on a special list and thus denied certain basic priveleges due to "questionable" posts you made in an online forum 15 years ago. We can imagine a wide variety of vague and controversial definitions of "questionable content" for this thought experiment.
Courts are of course complicated, and I imagine that police would abuse such a network to arrest people without means to fight back... but at the end of the day I can at least hope to be in front of a judge. And it's not like the courts are the ones doing the dystopian investigating.
In other words, systems set up against people doing bad things are also perfect for framing people inconvenient to the operators.
There's a broad region in between those two poles, where some cases are merely somewhat awful and not completely horrible, and other cases where I guess it's kind of okay, but not that great. The rest of the time, it's an apathetic, civil neither.
If anything, we need to slow down the justice system. Remove plea deals. For every charge to go before a jury. Force the DA to focus only on the bad crimes and let anyone with minor crimes off with no charges.
Hopefully at this point in the future humans will be augmented and have tools to circumvent this sort of thing. Confuse the AIs, jam the cameras, whatever.