I'm saying I'm not sure it makes it worse. The current rules seem to make the big 5 as winners at the expense of the ISPs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/20/opinion/is-big-tech-too-p...
I'm saying I'm not sure it makes it worse. The current rules seem to make the big 5 as winners at the expense of the ISPs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/20/opinion/is-big-tech-too-p...
If you want to talk about antitrust action against the big 5, I'm absolutely with you -- they are monopolists and they need to be broken up. But your solution is to redistribute ultimate power back to the most hated monopolists in the country? Who have a physical monopoly, often enforced by law and physical reality, not because people of mindshare and some unpleasant anti competitive bundling?
The gilded age was worse than the 90s. Then 90s was not great, but we punished Microsoft and moved on to something better. The solution is NOT to return to the gilded age with ISPs as modern monopolist robber barons which is what removing NN does.
At this point, I'm glad the big 5 are ultra powerful -- they are the only entities with the power to support consumers (the government won't) if they choose to do so. And sometimes, they do. Amazon is, for example.