Hacker News Reader

Comment by randyrand | Hacker News Reader

I'll help solve the paradox. "Don't care" can refer to at least 3 things:

1. don't care that there is sexual harassment at Uber 2. don't care about sexual harassment like that occurred at Uber 3. don't care that other people think most people care

My comment is about those that check off all 3. They are the majority, and they don't comment. For me, I only check off #1 and #2, hence the comment.

View on HN

I think part of the response you're getting is that "I don't care" is still vague.

It could mean you don't find it interesting or relevant to your life. Or it could mean you don't think sexual harassment is morally wrong. Or something else.

For example, I could say that I "don't care" about cholera deaths in Africa. I think it's a tragedy and hope the situation improves, but I'm not seeking out news about it or basing life-decisions around it. I "care" but I don't really care... at least not to the point that it changes my behavior.

Then again, I'm not jumping into discussions on cholera stories to tell people how much I don't care about cholera deaths. So, it feels like you're trying to make some big statement, e.g. taking a stand against "political correctness" or claiming sexual harassment isn't morally wrong.

Yes, I did go back and clarify my comment a bit already

Sexually harassment can definitely be morally wrong. But I'm not particularly outraged, mad, or upset by the sexual harassment scenario that happened at Uber, specifically. I don't think all sexual harassment should be lumped together, and doing so can lead to witch hunts.

Gotcha. I don't agree 100% with this clarified position (I think), but it seems like a rational position that we could debate. Not here of course. :) But you know, over drinks or whatevs.

Anyway, the point is that it's a much less outlandish statement than how I interpreted your original comment.

There's no can about it. It always is wrong.

So you probably think that air conditioning constitutes sexual harassment.

That doesn't make a lick of sense.

Why would do care whether other people think most people care? What makes this special? You are not posting similar comments under other articles.

That's an interesting question. I think there are pretty big bubbles that have formed in terms of ideology -- that clouds perception of the greater country/world/etc. For whatever reason, that annoys me. I don't really know why.

Other subjects, generally, don't have an ideological bubble around them.

Another user on this thread is saying I will get banned for my comment, which is a good illustration of how the problem is exacerbating.

There is a bubble of people who claim that harassment don't happen and the negative reaction to it is always unfair.

Then there is bubble of people who claim that serious harassment is all the time around to almist all women and most companies and non victims (e.g. males) don't care.

Which of these bubbles were you trying to prove wrong?

Risky move.

HN generally welcomes people with a wide set of beliefs and values. I don't think someone would be banned just because they say they don't care about something. Of course I could still be proven wrong.

I'm guessing he was referring to the loss of internet points for posting an opinion out of the mainstream on a topic like this, where even the normally open minded and discussion oriented HN folks expect you to toe the party line.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com