Viharo only quotes the RW article's preamble. The body of the article is more than ample in providing detail and citations to back itself up.
are you actually defending the RW article? It's obvious hatch job. The rationalwiki article references itself when it says "Viharo has a persecution complex.." and states that the entire site is a conspiracy theory and no evidence has been found for harassment"...with no reference what so ever.