The probability of me or any of my relatives going out and blow people up is 0.0 <lots of zeroes> x.
The probability of someone in that subset doing the same is small but absolutely non-zero.
I feel sorry for friendly Muslims.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangs_in_the_United_States#Rea...
I dont think that relatives of Eric Harris would have ever said "oh yea, that kids trouble. going to shoot up a school some day".
pretty lame argument youve got.
there are clearly more radicalized general idiots out there than there are radicalized muslims.
Trying to understand what leads human beings to kill and die for fuzzy causes might help. I suspect a perfect storm of mental issues, undesirable social status and support from the wrong people at the right time.
I also suspect we don't want all the answers, because we wouldn't want to expose how we convince our own young military not to walk out when sent to unjustified wars.
Do we have proofs that any of the violent ones had not converted at the time when they attacked?
That's chocking news to me, I though you had to be a muslim to join them.
OP says that only people part of "a subset of people" can be part of ISIS and propagate terror. implying that only people who grew up as muslim can become terrorists.
OP here. I did not say that.
>>OP here. I did not say that.
>OK. So what "subset of people" then?
Two corrections:
You talk like I mean general terrorists.
I'm talking only about the types of attacks we are talking about in this thread (attacks primarily target against civilians by attackers that do not expect or even attempt to get away alive).
It is written above: "everyone of these criminals belong to a very specific subset of people." (emphasis added).
>So what "subset of people" then?
Only the subset that are or are about to become muslims.
Again, until someone enlightens me I have yet to be aware of any of this kind of attacks by neither Christians nor Atheists.