In Praise of the Philly Stoop
phillymag.com
phillymag.com
People enter and exit their cars in the closed garage, never having the chance to greet their neighbors on the way, and also make what was traditionally a pedestrian-only zone more hazardous since now they drive across it (often with poor visibility).
As someone who has always lived in the Midwest or suburbs, when we bought our first house a couple years ago I was happy to have it be a rowhome in a small downtown, with an actual porch out front sticking into the sidewalk. I can sit out there on my bench swing thing and interact with my neighbors in a natural, informal way.
I personally think that this falls under the heading of what I deem anti-social behavior. Anti-social behavior isn't limited to property crime and violence, it's anything that dehumanizes your fellow man. The people who construct their life so they only interact with exactly the people whom they want are the most anti-social people I can imagine. I personally think they should move to the suburbs if they can't stand the thought of interacting with a neighbor.
Thankfully in Chicago we have alleys, and you have to pay a yearly surcharge for the 'no parking' area created by street cuts, so there aren't many driveways crossing sidewalks.
I'm deliberately invoking both meanings of the word, because I think taking the desire to avoid interaction to the extreme harms society.
Also, by wording it as "extreme", it becomes a bit difficult to have a debate. Doing "too much" of anything is by definition more than what is harmless.
In the case from the context above, one interpretation is just people's desire for privacy. I'd also say that by giving it a name with a negative connotation we are pressuring the people who have preferences that can be described as asocial to be more like the others and that I believe is unfair.
I don't think it's especially unfair to argue that engineering to prevent chance interactions should be discouraged, and invoking privacy in this context is a bugaboo - access to privacy really isn't the same thing as making sure that you never have to greet or talk to anyone in a way that isn't planned.
I know a lot of people who don't really have that sort of unplanned interaction with anyone, and they tend to be the same people who think I must be uncommonly brave to use my city's public transit system, which they erroneously fancy to be peopled primarily by dangerous characters. By preserving their ignorance of their fellow people, they free their imaginations to assume the worst, and in a democratic society where such imaginings can quite easily translate into wrongheaded and harmful public policy, I don't think it is at all hard to argue that such ignorance, and such fancy, grows questionable - even dangerous - to the same extent to which it is indulged.
Says who? It's one thing to invent a brand new word, but it's another to modify a word with already established meaning to a slightly different meaning just because some people started using it the wrong way and it stuck. See the word "poignant" for another great example of the active bastardization of English.
Wiktionary: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/antisocial
Merriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/antisocial
Oxford Dictionaries, English - as close as you get to OED without paying, and my library card's at home: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/antisocial
How many more would you like me to cite? And what's your problem with "poignant"?
Right -- it's not that they're "out to" cause harm. They just don't give an F.
So in that sense, it 'antisocial' seems more apt.
SF sadly does not have this http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/01/30/concrete-giveaway-free-... and still being studied last year according to http://www.sfcta.org/sites/default/files/content/Planning/Pa...
Regardless, that's actually a pretty easy question to answer, because Chicago gets charged for every minute a spot isn't available by the company they sold the street parking to.
Inside the loop, the price would be $43,891.30 for every parking spot removed.
Inside the CBD, but outside the loop, the price would be $35,040 for every parking spot removed.
The entire meter deal has been a boondoggle, and the previous mayor has been subpoenaed about it several times but has gotten out of it citing "health issues." It's really screwed over the cities flexibility when it comes to urban planning. Plus Chicago has the most expensive meters in the nation.
If we want people to stop needing parking, we need to actually improve transit.
Walk to the corner bodega, get a 6er of some cheap schwilly beer, return, sit.
Agreed, it is the best.
Historical note: Baltimore marble stoops were harvested to patch the cracks in DC's Washington Monument after the recent earthquake because they're from the same quarry. (Baltimore's monument needed no such patching and predates the DC monument by 59 years)
Nowadays you've got to be really actively, intentionally social. It's just too easy to sit on the couch, order food, watch Netflix, browse social media and ignore real life.
As the article states. people sit on the stoop. Perhaps less so as you mention due to indoor distractions, but still quite a bit.
Much as the suburbanite sits in the back yard, the true townhouser (not those phony things with garages in the front and no alleyways), sits on the stoop.
Today, condo development has destroyed some of these designs and the old apartment buildings don't ever seem to have anyone on the stoop or front porch. I guess people are more indoors orientated now or simply less social with their neighbors, at least in more gentrified neighborhoods. I barely know my neighbors to be honest. Sounds like the times haven't really changed much in Philly.
Interesting story -- I actually moved to East Garfield Park a few years ago. I honestly thought I would never interact with anyone in the neighborhood, given the fact that I'm from a completely different socioeconomic background. I know way more people now that I have in any other neighborhood I've lived in. Everyone is outside when it is nice out.
In my Minneapolis neighborhood, it's all 100 year old bungalows. Some have proper porches, most have stoops, and the stoops are set back from the street. Even the proper porches tend to be three-season or four-season (hey, it gets cold here!), with screens or windows isolating from the outside.
I like sitting out on the stoop and playing guitar, but it's not an opportunity to really interact with the neighbors much. At least I'm putting myself out there, though.
I'm waiting for the emerald ash borers to finally get to the beautiful, mature ash in my backyard. :( I love living in a forest, but hate the tree maladies. Luckily, they replanted all our curb trees with diversity, rather than the monocultures of older Minneapolis streets.
Is there any interest in a "weekly stoop" thread where people just comment about whatever interesting thing that comes up, nothing in particular? Things people find interesting, little discussions, things people want to know about. The kind of things that aren't really big enough for separate submissions, but could make up a few comments. I feel like that'd be pretty interesting. Has it been tried before?
In my experience it's interesting to get a slice of life of the user base for awhile but quickly gets old.
I've met so many people because they are drinking on a porch or on a rear deck and I've started talking to them, and next thing you know I'm drinking a beer.
There's often a sunroom/living room/den connected to the front porch in Chicago. This room is known as the frunch room. I'm not entirely sure how to spell it, but it's a portmanteau of front and porch.
<3 community