Hacker News Reader

>Is it just me or is this piece essentially devoid of any sort of real analysis?

Came to say that. Was expecting an investigation of at least some of the warnings...

It was light on information, but just documenting the approach is useful. Letting people know about it and helping people get started has value.

Saves you 1 hr of waiting, had you wanted to do this yourself.

Not really though. Perhaps everything is almost entirely false positives, but perhaps he just picked a specific bad example and claims a generalization that isn't true. Or maybe there is a simple trick to turn off the false positives. Or maybe the next version is much better...