What went wrong at BA?

Is this the BBC's idea of journalism? An anonymous "IT veteran" emailed some pet theories to their top technology correspondent and he literally pasted it into an article with zero critical analysis or independent commentary. How embarrassing.

The final paragraph says it all:

> BA has said little so far about what went wrong. However, it will now be under pressure from investors, staff and passengers to provide some answers.

BA should be under pressure from you to provide answers. That's your job.

There's absolutely no news in this article, it's just basic speculation of the kind any seasoned sysadmin could have made.

Should have been BREAKING: What went wrong at BA?

Other than "data center power is supposed to be reliable" this article doesn't say anything.